Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Members"
(New page: If we have a separate page for defectors, should we also have a page for current members? ~~~~) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If we have a separate page for defectors, should we also have a page for current members? [[User:Xanderao|Xanderao]] 10:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT) | If we have a separate page for defectors, should we also have a page for current members? [[User:Xanderao|Xanderao]] 10:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have been mulling this over. For awhile I tried to tag just current members as "Category:Members" and just defectors as "Category:Defectors". But then the text at the top of Category:Members mentions current, past, and future. So I think I'm going to go ahead and make a "Category:Current Members" which will be for anyone who is currently at CMU (with obvious exceptions for people who like to stick around but aren't CMU-affiliated) and was even remotely involved with KGB at some point for their stay here. Don't want to go into the nonsense of Voting/Active/whatever Members since that changes too often. --[[User:Eforney|eforney]] 15:19, 23 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree, and I feel that there are enough of us psychos who religiously edit the wiki to keep this sort of current for the forseeable future. [[User:Xanderao|Xanderao]] 16:51, 23 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:51, 23 June 2011
If we have a separate page for defectors, should we also have a page for current members? Xanderao 10:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
I have been mulling this over. For awhile I tried to tag just current members as "Category:Members" and just defectors as "Category:Defectors". But then the text at the top of Category:Members mentions current, past, and future. So I think I'm going to go ahead and make a "Category:Current Members" which will be for anyone who is currently at CMU (with obvious exceptions for people who like to stick around but aren't CMU-affiliated) and was even remotely involved with KGB at some point for their stay here. Don't want to go into the nonsense of Voting/Active/whatever Members since that changes too often. --eforney 15:19, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
I agree, and I feel that there are enough of us psychos who religiously edit the wiki to keep this sort of current for the forseeable future. Xanderao 16:51, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
