Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of committees without wiki pages"

Latest revision as of 23:30, 13 May 2011

Should I just make a page for each committee with just this information and relevant tags? Or should there always be something more substantive? Xanderao 12:29, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

I don't think that's really warranted. I mean, you could if you wanted to, but I'd prefer to have substantive things, more so than this. Tiny wiki pages look bad, in my opinion. By the way, remember to sign your posts on the discussion page by using 4 tildes (~x4) tbroman 01:05, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

So in that case, do you think the more interesting bits of discussion should go up there? Or should we just embellish with a bit of trolling? Xanderao 12:31, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

If the bits of discussion directly relate to the committee and aren't simply a lot of "such-and-such Committee approves" then maybe. The Ad-Hoc Block Committee is a good example of where discussion can go on the wiki page. I think we shouldn't take it upon ourselves to create substantive pages for all of these--many committees are created once and never reported from again. Those probably don't deserve real pages. tbroman 13:27, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

That does make sense - but what do you think of the stuff I did for the bubblesaurus committee? Do you think that kind of stuff would be good for appropriate committees? I think it could work if it is not overdone... In any case I think we should set up a page/home for the so called "lost committees" where perhaps there were some worthy ones that just got forgotten along the way. Xanderao 14:21, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

Yeah, I had thought of something similar as far as your "lost committees" idea. I thought maybe I'd leave it for a while, like until I was done being recsec, and then figure it out. As for the Bubblesaurus Committee, it was good, I liked what you wrote. Technically, you're not supposed to change the Purpose statement, but you were within the margin of error there. tbroman 14:40, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

I did not change the purpose - it is separated by an extra line, but I was not sure what to call it so I left it blank. Maybe i will add a lore heading... Xanderao 00:26, 14 May 2011 (EDT)

That wasn't what I was referring to--I meant you added the words "Also Supported". This is technically changing the purpose, but as I said it's within the "margin of error". tbroman 00:30, 14 May 2011 (EDT)