Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of committees without wiki pages"
From KGB Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | should i just make a page for each committee with just this information and relevant tags? or should there always be something more substantive? | + | should i just make a page for each committee with just this information and relevant tags? or should there always be something more substantive? |
| + | [[User:Xanderao|Xanderao]] 12:29, 13 May 2011 (EDT)[[xander]] | ||
I don't think that's really warranted. I mean, you could if you wanted to, but I'd prefer to have substantive things, more so than this. Tiny wiki pages look bad, in my opinion. By the way, remember to sign your posts on the discussion page by using 4 tildes (~x4) [[User:Tbroman|tbroman]] 01:05, 13 May 2011 (EDT) | I don't think that's really warranted. I mean, you could if you wanted to, but I'd prefer to have substantive things, more so than this. Tiny wiki pages look bad, in my opinion. By the way, remember to sign your posts on the discussion page by using 4 tildes (~x4) [[User:Tbroman|tbroman]] 01:05, 13 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:29, 13 May 2011
should i just make a page for each committee with just this information and relevant tags? or should there always be something more substantive? Xanderao 12:29, 13 May 2011 (EDT)xander
I don't think that's really warranted. I mean, you could if you wanted to, but I'd prefer to have substantive things, more so than this. Tiny wiki pages look bad, in my opinion. By the way, remember to sign your posts on the discussion page by using 4 tildes (~x4) tbroman 01:05, 13 May 2011 (EDT)
