Talk:List of committees without wiki pages

Should I just make a page for each committee with just this information and relevant tags? Or should there always be something more substantive? Xanderao 12:29, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

I don't think that's really warranted. I mean, you could if you wanted to, but I'd prefer to have substantive things, more so than this. Tiny wiki pages look bad, in my opinion. By the way, remember to sign your posts on the discussion page by using 4 tildes (~x4) tbroman 01:05, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

So in that case, do you think the more interesting bits of discussion should go up there? Or should we just embellish with a bit of trolling? Xanderao 12:31, 13 May 2011 (EDT)

If the bits of discussion directly relate to the committee and aren't simply a lot of "such-and-such Committee approves" then maybe. The Ad-Hoc Block Committee is a good example of where discussion can go on the wiki page. I think we shouldn't take it upon ourselves to create substantive pages for all of these--many committees are created once and never reported from again. Those probably don't deserve real pages. tbroman 13:27, 13 May 2011 (EDT)